AI Writing, Software Testing Templates
Business Approval Documents – Achieving Clarity and Confidence with AI
Apr
(Part 3 of the Klariti Primer on AI for Software Testing)
Welcome back to Klariti’s Primer on using AI for Software Testing. In the previous articles, we explored AI’s role in refining Acceptance Criteria and managing Action Items.
As testing professionals, we understand that our technical validation is only part of the story; securing formal business approval is a critical gate in the delivery pipeline. Today, we focus on how AI can enhance the creation and effectiveness of Business Approval Forms and Business Approval Checklists.
The Challenge: Bridging the Gap Between Technical Validation and Business Sign-Off
Obtaining meaningful business approval often presents a significant challenge. We need to translate complex testing outcomes, potential risks, and feature completeness into a format that is easily digestible and provides genuine assurance to non-technical stakeholders.
Simply presenting a list of executed test cases rarely suffices. The core problem lies in crafting approval documents that are comprehensive, clear, accurately reflect the state of the software, and instill confidence in the approver.
Failure to do so can result in “rubber-stamping” based on incomplete understanding, or conversely, delays caused by stakeholder uncertainty and requests for excessive clarification. How do you ensure your approval requests truly inform and enable confident decision-making?
Scenario/Context: The High Cost of Ambiguous Approvals
Consider a scenario I encountered: a major feature release received business approval based on a checklist confirming all functional requirements were met.
The approval form included a brief summary stating testing was “successful.” However, the underlying test reports indicated several performance-related warnings under simulated peak load, which weren’t explicitly highlighted in business terms on the approval documents.
Shortly after release, the system experienced significant slowdowns during peak usage, impacting customer experience and requiring urgent, costly remediation.
The formal approval existed, but it was based on an incomplete picture presented to the business approver. This highlights the critical need for approval documentation that accurately conveys not just functional completion, but also relevant quality attributes and residual risks in a business-relevant context. An ineffective approval process transfers risk unknowingly, rather than managing it consciously.
The AI Solution: Enhancing Precision and Communication in Approval Documentation
Using AI as part of my workflow has become integral to my process for preparing more robust Business Approval forms and checklists. It acts as a powerful assistant in translating technical details and ensuring comprehensive coverage. Here’s how I apply it:
-
Synthesizing Test Outcomes for Business Summaries: Raw test results or lengthy summary reports are often too granular for business approvers. AI excels at distillation.
How I Use It: I provide the AI with key inputs: the Test Summary Report, a list of critical defects addressed, outstanding low-priority issues, and the original high-level requirements.
Prompt Example:
"Analyze the attached Test Summary Report, list of resolved critical defects (Sev 1 & 2), and remaining known issues (Sev 3 & 4). Generate a concise (max 250 words) executive summary for a Business Approval Form. Focus on confirming that core requirements [list key requirements] have been met, highlight major quality improvements achieved (e.g., performance, security), and briefly state the nature of residual risks (e.g., minor cosmetic issues). Ensure the language is suitable for a non-technical VP of Product."Deeper Impact: This approach transforms dense technical data into a focused narrative. For instance, instead of just stating “150 test cases passed, 5 failed (Sev 4)”, the AI helped me generate text like: “Testing confirms all core user registration and profile management functionalities operate as specified. Significant security hardening was implemented, addressing previously identified vulnerabilities. User interface responsiveness has improved by an average of 15%. Five minor cosmetic defects remain, documented in the issue log, with no impact on core functionality. We recommend approval based on successful validation against key business objectives.” This provides context and assurance far more effectively.
-
Generating Comprehensive Approval Checklist Items: Standard checklists can become outdated or miss context-specific needs. AI can help tailor them.
How I Use It: I feed the AI the project’s requirements documentation, acceptance criteria, and sometimes even the Risk Register.
Prompt Example:
"Based on the provided requirements document for the 'Online Payment Integration' feature and the associated Risk Log entries (focusing on security and compliance risks), generate a list of specific checklist items for the Business Approval Checklist. Ensure items cover functional completeness, security validation, compliance adherence (PCI-DSS), usability confirmation, and performance verification."Deeper Impact: For a recent financial module, our standard checklist was generic. Using the above prompt, the AI suggested specific items like: “Confirm successful processing of Visa, Mastercard, and Amex transactions,” “Verify error handling for declined transactions matches specified user messaging,” “Confirm transaction data masking complies with PCI-DSS requirements,” and “Validate transaction completion time under simulated load meets the 3-second target.” This level of specificity, directly tied to requirements and risks, ensures a more thorough verification before approval is sought.
-
Refining Language for Clarity and Professionalism: Ensuring the language used is unambiguous and professional is crucial for stakeholder confidence.
How I Use It: I paste draft sections of the approval form or checklist items into the AI for review.
Prompt Example:
"Review the following text intended for a Business Approval Form. Rewrite it to enhance clarity, remove technical jargon, and ensure a professional and confident tone. The audience is a business director with limited technical background: [Paste draft text here]."Deeper Impact: AI often identifies and rephrases passive language, overly technical terms, or potentially ambiguous statements, leading to clearer communication and reducing back-and-forth clarification cycles.
-
Cross-Referencing and Consistency Checks: AI can help ensure alignment between the approval documents, test plan exit criteria, and requirements.
Prompt Example:
"Compare the statements made in this draft Business Approval Form summary against the Exit Criteria defined in the attached Test Plan. Identify any discrepancies or areas where the summary does not explicitly confirm meeting a specific exit criterion."
Integrating AI into the Workflow:
- Use AI outputs as first drafts or suggestions.
- Crucially, always apply expert review: Validate the AI’s summaries against the source data. Ensure checklist items are relevant and correctly prioritized. Confirm risk statements accurately reflect the testing outcomes. AI assists judgment, it doesn’t replace it.
- Collaborate with Product Owners or Business Analysts to refine the AI-generated content, ensuring it resonates with business stakeholders.
Lessons Learned
By incorporating AI into the preparation of Business Approval Forms and Checklists, we can significantly improve their quality and effectiveness. This leads to more informed decisions, smoother approval cycles, and better alignment between technical teams and business stakeholders. The key is using AI to translate complexity and ensure thoroughness, always guided by our professional judgment.
Stay informed on AI advancements in testing: Sign up for the Klariti Newsletter at https://klariti.com/newsletter/ for ongoing insights, templates, and best practices!
Next up: Change is constant in software development. Managing it effectively is vital. We’ll delve into the suite of change management documents next: Change Control Log, Change History Log, Change Management Tracking Log, Change Register, and Change Request Form.
We’ll explore how AI can help streamline the often complex process of tracking, assessing, and approving changes during the testing lifecycle.
Templates (Free and Pewmium)
Explore these relevant Klariti resources:
